Calling Isis a “gang of murderous thugs pretending to act in the name of faith”, Sir Richard advocated looking at the causes of extremist violent movements.
Here’s why what Sir Branson said is idiotic: ISIS is NOT a “gang of murderous thugs pretending to act in the name of faith.” They ARE acting in the name of their faith! The majority of Muslims you meet are not! Ask any Islamic cleric and they will tell you, if they’re not practicing the law of lying to non-Muslims, (taqiyya and kitman) that Islamic law says to kill infidels.
The KKK, on the other hand, were NOT in compliance with American Law. They actually WERE a radical extremist group, acting outside the bounds of the American Constitution or any Christian religion they may have claimed to belong to.
The KKK were breaking laws, and dare I say it, sinning. Neither American Law nor Christianity advocate killing others if they disagree with you.
ISIS, on the other hand, are being true and compliant to their Islamic faith and laws.
THAT is the difference and why what Sir Richard said is idiotic.
The Nigerian accused of trying to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner had his suicide mission personally blessed in Yemen by Anwar al-Awlaki, the Muslim imam suspected of radicalizing the Fort Hood shooting suspect, a U.S. intelligence source has told The Washington Times.
I guess this would be a blessing FAIL?
I want to know how a “religion of peace” can continue to call itself that while blessing suicide missions and murder? I’m just sayin’.
There are many peaceful Muslims out there. Sadly, there are many who are not, and we need to keep them exposed so we know who they are. Tolerance is good to a point. We should not be tolerant of intolerance, like Muslim extremists. They would just as soon kill us for our tolerance.
A report posted on Islam Watch, a site run by Muslims who oppose intolerant teachings and hatred for unbelievers, exposes a prominent Islamic cleric and lawyer who support extreme punishment for non-Muslims — including killing and rape.